|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
The Supreme Court can -- and has -- hand down historic decisions with just a 5-4 vote. With the recent Bush v. Gore election case, the country watched a bitterly split Court decide by just one vote the presidency of the United States, putting into office a man who called Justices Scalia and Thomas - the two most ardent anti-choice votes on the Court - his "model Justices." We must make it known that we will not accept a Supreme Court Justice modeled after Thomas and Scalia, who would turn back the clock on women's rights. If Roe is reversed, women will be returned to the days of unsafe, back-alley abortions. Some women will be maimed, some will die, and others will suffer the consequences of an unwanted pregnancy. If Roe is reversed, our fundamental right to privacy - upon which the Court's decision was based - is in jeopardy. And two other landmark cases, Griswold v. Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. Baird - both of which made birth control legal through the right to privacy- would also be at stake. Fighting anti-choice nominations to the Supreme Court is crucial in saving Roe v. Wade and women's reproductive rights. Nominations, made by the President, are first deliberated by the Senate Judiciary Committee; then they proceed to the entire Senate for a vote to confirm or deny appointment. We must be vigilant, and we must fight anti-choice nominations to the Supreme Court. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright 2000, The Feminist Majority |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||