Military Budget Cuts Overdue
Since the end of the Cold War, there has been broad agreement among
many national security experts that the military could be safely cut
by 40 to 80% in five to ten years3. Yet the military budget
has remained quite high by historical standards and is projected to
still be comparable to Cold War spending levels in the year 2001. After
World War II, with detailed planning for conversion in place, the defense
economy was drastically reduced in just two years. The cuts in the military
budget in the last few years have caused job losses and community dislocation
because there is no plan for integrating these workers and plants into
the civilian economy. Many groups in the US are working to convert military
facilities to civilian purposes, but so far there is no coherent federal
support for these efforts.
The US is still spending over $270 billion a year for Pentagon programs,
but the total spent on the military includes military aid, veterans
benefits, part of the NASA budget, and one-half of the interest on the
debt that can be attributed to past military spending4. This
brings the total to over $450 billion for FY95.
The continuing high military spending is based on a totally unrealistic
assessment of threats to the US. In 1990, Colin Powell lamented "I'm
running out of demons. I'm running out of villains." The "potential
adversaries" identified in Pentagon reviews are Iraq, China, North
Korea, Iran, Cuba and Libya. The US is spending ten times the combined
spending of all of them. In addition, the US still forks over tens
of billions of dollars a year to "defend" Western Europe against
a non-existent Soviet Union.
Pentagon planners want to be able to fight two wars in developing
countries simultaneously, imaginary scenarios that enable the military
contractors and armed forces to keep tax dollars flowing. These same
contractors are now busy selling weapons abroad at an unprecedented
rate, thereby increasing the chance of violence and civil wars.
A combination of de-militarization, conversion, development of
peacekeeping infrastructure, and increased international cooperation
would make a large military unnecessary. Conversion, peacekeeping,
and dismantling nuclear weapons are examples of parts of the military
budget that should be increasing but are being cut back.
We can reach a 50% reduction in military expenditures over the next
five years. That would free up over $350 billion for investments in
rebuilding America. Below are examples of how $350 billion worth of
savings could be found in the military budget:
| Eliminate additional Trident II (D-5 missiles) |
$2.8 b |
| Cancel MILSTAR communications satellite |
$4.6 b |
| Terminate C-17 cargo transport aircraft |
$10.5 b |
| Cancel F-22 Advanced Technology Fighter |
$18.5 b |
| Eliminate support for conventional arm transfers |
$23.9 b |
| Cut Ballistic Missile Defense |
$12.0 b |
| Reduce foreign intelligence budget |
$17.0 b |
| Increase burden-sharing by allies |
$17.5 b |
| Reduce active-duty force structure |
$132.0 b |
| Eliminate SSN-21 Seawolf and New Attack Submarine |
$10.6 b |
| Eliminate corporate welfare to defense contractors |
$50.0 b |
| Cut funds for the B-2 Bomber |
$15.0 b |
| Recover unaccounted for Pentagon funds and reduce
waste and abuse |
$30.0 b |
| Close more bases and nuclear laboratories |
$18.0 b |
| |
|
| In addition, conversion and reduction of nuclear
forces need additional investment: |
|
| Implementation of START II agreement to reduce
nuclear forces |
+$6.4 b |
| Expanded industry conversion and worker retraining |
+$6.0 b |
| |
|
| Net Cuts |
$350.0 billion |
Women's Budget Intro | How
Is the Pie Sliced? | What Do Women Want?
| Military Budget Cuts Overdue
What Are the Trade-Offs? | What
You Can Do
|