Feminist Majority Foundation: working for women's equality
Feminist News
Feminist Career Center
Take Action Online
Special Features
Feminist Calendar
Feminist Online Store
Feminist E-Mail Alerts
Donate to the Feminist Majority
Help Afghan Women
Sister Site: www.FeministCampus.org
Reproductive Rights
Women & Policing
Global Feminism
Emergency Resources for Women
Breast Cancer Center
Women & Girls in Sports
Feminist Research Center
Arts & Entertainment
Feminist Site Reviews
About FMF
Donate to the Feminist Majority Foundation
FMF Campaigns & Projects
For the Press
 
Affirmative Action Information Center  

Affirmative Action: Expanding Educational Opportunities for Women

Opening Doors in Education

Women have made great strides in education due to Title IX, a federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in federally-funded education, and affirmative action programs that have increased hiring, promotion, training, athletic and admission opportunities in educational institutions.

The dramatic increase in the enrollment in and graduation of women from medical schools is one example of the gains women have made as a result of affirmative action programs.

Percentage of Female Enrollees and Graduates of
Medical Schools, 1969-19901

1969-70 1979-80 1989-90
Total Enrolled 9% 25.3% 36.2%
Graduates 8.4% 23.1% 34.5%

Affirmative action programs also improve the quality of life of communities. A study of graduates of the University of California School of Medicine in San Diego found the physicians who had been admitted with the assistance of the Special Admission Subcommittee saw more patients daily and were more likely to practice primary care medicine in traditionally neglected rural and inner-city areas than graduates admitted through traditional mechanisms.2

Women have significantly increased their share of doctoral and professional degrees since affirmative action programs began. In 1971, women received only 14.4% of doctorates. In 1991, the number of female doctoral recipients had jumped to 36.8%.3

Affirmative action has increased women's opportunities in vocational education. The Perkins Act, implemented in 1985, requires states to use 10.5% of federal funds for vocational education for services to girls and to women such as displaced homemakers and single parents. Seventy-one percent of displaced homemakers and single parents found jobs after completing a Florida program funded by these grants, and their average salaries doubled.4

Women's participation in college and high school sports has greatly increased over the past two decades. In 1972, women comprised only 15.6% of college athletes. As of 1993, that percentage had grown to 34.8%.5 In high school athletics, the numbers of girls participating in interscholastic sports increased from seven percent in 1972 to 37% in 1992.

Discrimination Continues in Higher Education

The fight for equal educational opportunities, however, is far from over. Women are receiving doctorates in greater numbers, but gains have been less in non-traditional fields. In 1991, Ph.D.s in the fields of social science and humanities were awarded in almost even numbers to women and men. But women comprised only 8.7% of engineering doctorates and 18.4% of doctoral degrees in the physical sciences.6

Women are also shortchanged in scholarships and other forms of financial support for post-graduate education. Women rely on their personal and family resources to finance their education, while men can count on university financial support. According to the National Research Council, 56.1% of male doctoral recipients financed their graduate education with university support, compared with 39.9% of women. Of women doctoral recipients, 50.4% paid for their education through personal resources, while only 31% of men relied on their personal finances.7

Vocational Education Remains Sex-segregated

Men are given more vocational education opportunities than are women. Women and girls enrolled in vocational education are clustered in fields that are traditionally female and pay less.8 In 1992, 70% of enrollees in health courses and 76% of students enrolled in occupational home economics were women. Men accounted for 77% of enrollees in trade and industry courses and 72% of students concentrating in technical education.9

Glass Ceiling Exists in Teaching

While the number of women faculty members at colleges and universities has increased as a result of affirmative action, women are concentrated among the junior faculty and are much less likely than men to hold tenure status. In 1991, women held only 20.5% of tenured faculty positions.10

Women on College and University Faculties by Academic Rank, 1991 11

Total Women Percentage
Professors 144,341 21,168 14.7%
Associate Professors 116,631 32,320 27.7%
Assistant Professors 126,344 50,215 39.7%
Instructors 78,082 36,958 47.3%
Lecturers 11,275 5,913 52.4%

Women faculty members receive far lower salaries than their male counterparts. Overall, women faculty make 80.8 cents for every dollar men faculty are paid. The wage gap persists even among tenured faculty members. Women who are full professors make only 88.5% of the salaries of men who are full professors.12

Despite being the majority of high school and grammar school teachers, women are under-represented in administrative positions. Women accounted for only 30% of all principals at public schools during the 1990-91 school year.13

Barriers Remain in Athletics

Although more than a third of college athletes are women, men receive a disproportionate share of the money spent on college athletics. Male athletes receive 70% of scholarship money, 77% of operating budgets, and 83% of recruitment money.14

The percentage of girl athletes has been increasing very slowly and in some cases decreasing since the late 1970s.15 The percentage of high school girl sophomores participating in athletic teams actually declined from 46% in 1980 to 41% in 1990.16

Real Preferential Treatment in Education

The children of alumni -- not women and minorities -- are the prime beneficiaries of preferential treatment at colleges and universities. The slots reserved for children of alumni are called "legacy" seats.

The legacy preference in admissions in many cases results in the acceptance of less qualified candidates over better qualified candidates. The legacy preferences are believed to especially benefit whites, males, and the children of wealthy alumni.

Children of alumni at Harvard University in 1991 were three times more likely to be accepted than other prospective students. At Yale, children of alumni are two and a half times more likely to be admitted.

Dartmouth in 1991 gave admission to 57% of its legacy applicants, and only 27% of other students. Sixty-six percent of alumni children were accepted at the University of Pennsylvania. Twenty-five percent of Notre Dame's freshman class is saved for the children of alumni.17

1 American Medical Association (AMA), Women in Medicine in America: In the Mainstream, (Chicago: AMA, 1991) 3.
2 Nolan E. Penn et. al., "Affirmative Action at Work: A Survey of Graduates of the University of California, San Diego, Medical School, American Journal of Public Health 76 (September 1986) 1145-46.
3 National Research Council Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, Summary Report 1991: Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities, (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1993) 11.
4 National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education Vocational Education Task Force, Empowering America's Families: Documenting the Success of Vocational Equity Programs for Women and Girls, (Washington, DC: National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education, March 1995)
5 NCAA, The Sports and Recreation Programs of the Nation's Universities and Colleges, Reports #3-7; and NCAA Participation Studies, 1987-93.
6 National Research Council, 11.
7 Ibid., 18.
8 National Assessment of Vocational Education, Summary of Findings and Recommendations, (Springfield: U.S. Department of Commerce, July 1989) 57.
9 National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education, 8.
10 U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics, 1994.
11 Ibid.
12 US. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Salaries, Tenure, and Fringe Benefits 1993-94, 4.
13 US. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey: 1990-1991.
14 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), Final Report of the NCAA Gender-Equity Task Force, 1992.
15 National Federation of State High School Associations, 1993 Sports Participation Survey (Kansas City, MO).
16 US. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, America's High School Sophomores: A Ten Year Comparison (June 1993) 32.
17 John Larew, "Why Are Droves of Unqualified, Unprepared Kids Getting Into Our Top Colleges," Washington Monthly 23, 6: 10.
   


Donate
| About Us | Search | Shop | Home

© Copyright 2007, Feminist Majority Foundation