Feminist Majority Foundation: working for women's equality
Feminist News
Feminist Career Center
Take Action Online
Special Features
Feminist Calendar
Feminist Online Store
Feminist E-Mail Alerts
Donate to the Feminist Majority
Help Afghan Women
Sister Site: www.FeministCampus.org
Reproductive Rights
Women & Policing
Global Feminism
Emergency Resources for Women
Breast Cancer Center
Women & Girls in Sports
Feminist Research Center
Arts & Entertainment
Feminist Site Reviews
About FMF
Donate to the Feminist Majority Foundation
FMF Campaigns & Projects
For the Press
 

 

Testimony Before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Advisory Committee on Reproductive Health

July 19, 1996

Eleanor Smeal, President
Feminist Majority Foundation

My name is Eleanor Smeal. I am President of the Feminist Majority Foundation.

For the past eight years, French women and women in Great Britain, Sweden and China have had available to them the option of medical abortion. For eight long years, American women have fought to have this choice available to them.

Every step of the way, rather than decisions being based on pure science and medicine, politics instead have blocked or slowed the distribution of mifepristone. If only the medical well-being of women were the issue, mifepristone would have been approved eight years ago.

The Feminist Majority Foundation has led the nation's largest public education campaign to make mifepristone available in the U.S. The Feminist Majority Foundation began our Campaign for RU 486 and Contraceptive Research in 1988 after an exhaustive review of scientific data on mifepristone, extensive consultations with leading scientists and health care providers in the U.S. and abroad, and visits to clinics in France where we spoke with women who had undergone medical abortions with mifepristone. As women's health advocates, we wanted to make sure mifepristone was as safe, effective, and acceptable to women as it appeared from news reports. Our conclusion: Mifepristone as a method of early abortion and as a potential treatment for diseases and conditions ranging from some forms of breast cancer to endometriosis is major medical breakthrough in women's health care that must be made available to women in the United States.

The feminist and scientific communities in the U.S. share this very positive assessment of mifepristone. Over the past seven years, we have delivered over 700,000 petitions from women and men in this country urging the French company that developed RU 486 and its German parent company to license the compound in the U.S. We also presented petitions from 3,000 scientists and academicians who were outraged at the medical McCarthyism of allowing politics to prevail over scientific research. All major feminist and women's organizations and medical and scientific associations in this country have passed resolutions asking for introduction of mifepristone to the United States and for an expansion of trials on the compound's many promising indications. These associations include the American Public Health Association, National Organization for Women, American Psychological Association, American Association for the Advancement of Science, National Abortion Rights Action League, Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, National Women's Health Network, Endocrine Society, and American Institute of Biological Sciences to name a few.

And the public supports mifepristone. Last year, Lou Harris, the dean of pollsters, asked a nationwide, cross-section of Americans whether or not they thought RU 486 should be made available to women in the U.S. An overwhelming 66% said yes, which is especially significant since mifepristone is not yet on the market here. Legislatures in states such as New Hampshire, California, Hawaii, Colorado and Maine have passed resolutions in support of mifepristone.

Physicians also are ready to incorporate mifepristone into their practice of medicine. The Kaiser Foundation found that one-third of obstetricians and gynecologists who currently do not perform abortions are interested in administering mifepristone.

Why has mifepristone inspired such enthusiasm among women and health care providers? Used in France up to 49 days and in Great Britain and Sweden up to 63 days, mifepristone is a safe, effective method of early abortion. Since physicians generally do not perform vacuum aspiration abortions until the seventh week of pregnancy or later, mifepristone is the only method of early abortion a women can seek as soon as she knows that she is pregnant. Mifepristone gives women greater control over their termination of pregnancies. The mifepristone procedure is non-invasive, does not require anaethesia, and has no risk of infection.

A leading mifepristone researcher, Dr. Gary Hodgen, who is President of the Jones Institute Foundation and Professor of Reproductive Medicine at the Eastern Virginia Medical School, had planned to testify today. Dr. Hodgen was called away for a family emergency, but he wanted me to convey to you his conclusions about the compound's safety. Dr. Hodgen brought the first RU 486 into the USA in 1982. He has studied mifepristone extensively in both pre-clinical and clinical trials, some up tone year of therapy. He has published over 30 peer-reviewed articles on RU 486. In all of his research experience, Dr. Hodgen has found no scientific evidence of safety problems from mifepristone. Even embryonic and fetal development progressed normally, despite earl exposure to RU 486 either in vitro or in utero. Dr. Hodgen concludes, "I believe that this drug is safe for women!"

The Feminist Majority Foundation receives calls almost daily from women wanting to know where they can go to obtain RU 486. Some of these women so want access to this medication that they are willing to travel to Great Britain to the Marie Stopes Clinic which accepts American patients. Women who have had access to mifepristone greet the new procedure very positively. In France, approximately 80% of women seeking abortion during the early stage of pregnancy for which mifepristone is appropriate choose the medical procedure over surgical abortion. In the United States, where almost 50% of abortions now take place in the first nine weeks of pregnancy, and 90% are performed in the first trimester. Mifepristone will replace at least 50% of surgical abortions.

The Feminist Majority Foundation has fought long and hard to protect women's access to abortion and other medical services. In addition to our work to bring mifepristone to this country, we lead a nationwide National Clinic Access Project to protect clinics from anti-abortion violence. We work closely with non-profit clinics, for-profit clinics and individual doctors that perform abortions. Our annual National Clinic Violence Survey found that in 1995 violence at clinics experienced an decline overall, but 38.7% of clinics still faced one or more of the most severe forms of violence, including death threats, stalking, bomb threats and bombings, chemical attacks, blockades, invasions, arson and arson threats. Availability of mifepristone could significantly curb anti-abortion violence. As more physicians begin to administer mifepristone, abortion services will become more decentralized significantly undermining anti-abortion violence at clinics.

The time for approval of mifepristone is now -- and long overdue. Every day that mifepristone is not available to American women is another day that some woman will suffer needlessly. And, equally important, every day mifepristone is not available is another day that scientific development of anti-progestins for a number of serious diseases and conditions primarily affecting women will be delayed.

Today's hearing is on the safety and efficacy of mifepristone as a method of pregnancy termination. But your actions today and the FDA's ongoing review process of the Population Council's New Drug Application for mifepristone as an abortifacient have great bearing on future research and development of mifepristone as a treatment for a whole host of diseases and conditions that affect both women and men.

In 1989, under the Bush Administration, the FDA issued an "import alert" on RU 486 sending the message that the United States was hostile towards the research and development of mifepristone. The import alert, as scientific researchers testified before Congress, effectively brought to a halt even non-abortion research on mifepristone. It is time for the FDA to reverse this negative symbolism. With its approval of mifepristone, the FDA will signal scientists and manufacturers that research on the compound's many indications for improving women's health can move forward at long last.

Here are just some of the promising uses of mifepristone that result from the compounds properties as both an anti-progestin and an anti-glucocorticoid:

  • Mifepristone shows promise as a treatment for progesterone-dependent breast cancers, which account for some forty percent of all breast cancer tumors. (Add footnotes) New research has found mifepristone may inhibit the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells.
  • Other trials have found that mifepristone may be used to treat endometriosis and fibroid tumors. (Add footnotes)
  • Meningiomas, brain tumors which can be fatal if inoperable, have shown some response to mifepristone in clinical trials. Meningiomas occur two times more frequently in women than men. (Add footnotes)
  • Some forms of Cushing's Syndrome, an adrenal disorder that results from the over-production of cortisol and that primarily affects women in their 20s-40s, can be treated with mifepristone. (Add footnotes) Two survivors of Cushing's Syndrome testified before Congress in 1990 that mifepristone saved their lives. (Add footnotes)
  • Labor induction to facilitate birth and emergency contraception are two of the many other serious conditions for which mifepristone may be an effective treatment. (Add footnotes.)
  • Mifepristone's anti-glucocorticoid action may have profound indications for the treatment of HIV virus, Alzheimer's, depression and other diseases and conditions related to elevated levels of cortisol.

And scientists want to do this research. Two prominent researchers who have studied mifepristone asked me to submit their testimony today and to convey to this Committee how much your recommendation and FDA approval of mifepristone will mean to women's health research. Dr. Kathryn Horowitz, a breast cancer researcher at the University of Colorado, who testified before Congress that the FDA's import alert had impeded her ability to secure supplies of RU 486, now is using the Chinese version of mifepristone in trials. Dr. Ana Murphy conducted some of the pioneering research on the use of mifepristone as a treatment for endometriosis and fibroid tumors. This research has been stalled by limits on the supply of mifepristone available for U.S. trials in the absence of an American distributor for the compound. Approval of mifepristone by the FDA will finally open the doors to much-needed medical research.

The women of this nation already waited far too long to have access to the same medical treatment available to women in Europe. Over 200,000 women from around the world have used mifepristone as a method of early abortion. It is safe. It is effective. Mifepristone has met and exceeded all FDA requirements for licensing. The Population Council has submitted 163 volumes of data to the FDA. We urge this Advisory Committee and the FDA to act expeditiously to allow this medical advance to finally be brought to American women.

Thank you.

Fact Sheets on Mifepristone

The Chronology of The Fight to Bring RU 486 to American Women

   


Donate
| About Us | Search | Shop | Home

© Copyright 2007, Feminist Majority Foundation